Lap-Christs for the Entertainment of Silly Women

S.M. Hutchens of Mere Comments makes a few observations about the phenomenon of the Oprah Book Club, noting Oprah's contribution to society in increasing the rate of literacy, but then coming to this sobering conclusion.

Mere literacy has no value in itself. It is worthy only as the servant of virtue. The virtues of Oprahism, however, appear to be subordinate to, and ordered by, the prime virtue of self-realization and self-actualization rather than that of finding the self by losing it in sacrificial service to others, subject to the will of God. Its heroes tend to be Prometheans injured by, and in defiance of, the Traditional Moral Order (let us all weep for them a bit), lap-christs for the entertainment of silly women. Oprahism, to be sure, is chock-full of "virtues," but the order in which they are placed relative to one another in the scheme of the whole makes the phenomenon a veil of evil.

The Apostle Paul warned Timothy of the treachery of false teachers "who creep into households and capture weak women, burdened with sins and led astray by various passions, always learning and never able to arrive at a knowledge of the truth" (2 Timothy 3:6-7). The Greek term translated "weak women" is gunaikaria, that is, "little women," with the strong implication of gullibility. Some modern translations go so far as to render it "silly women." In his first letter to Timothy, Paul admonishes him to reject "irreverent, silly myths" (1 Timothy 4:7), literally graowdeis mythos, "old women's myths" or, in the popular vernacular, "old wives' tales." Hutchens may have had these biblical allusions in the back of his mind when he penned "lap-christs for the entertainment of silly women." Oprah and her minions will undoubtedly complain that he is being insensitive and politcally incorrect. But that's probably his point.

Warning: Oprah Can Be Hazardous to Your Health

As if Oprah Winfrey didn't have enough problems with her scandal-plagued school in South Africa and a fan backlash for her support of Barack Obama, now comes a report out of Australia that the feel-good, do-it-yourself "spirituality" she champions is not exactly the healthiest of lifestyle choices.

The first study examining young adults' religious and spiritual thoughts, behavior and feelings in Australia has found those replacing traditional religious beliefs with trendy, self-focused religions and spirituality are not the happier for their attempts at self-transformation.

Rosemary Aird conducted surveys of 3,705 21-year-olds in Brisbane as part of her Ph.D. studies at the University of Queensland's School of Population Health.

"I had a look at two different beliefs – one was a belief in God, associated with traditional religions, and the other was the newer belief in a spiritual or higher power other than God," Aird told the Brisbane Times.

Her research found the newer non-traditional beliefs linked to higher rates of "anxiety, depression, disturbed and suspicious ways of thinking and anti-social behavior" – results, she suggested, arising from New Age beliefs focused on self-transformation, self-fulfillment and self-enlightenment to the exclusion of community.

"Traditional religion tends to promote the idea of social responsibility and thinking of others' interests, whereas the New Age movement pushes the idea that we can transform the world by changing ourselves.

"The downside is that people are very much on their own and not part of a community, which may lead to a kind of isolation," she said.

Aird, a 51-year-old agnostic, said individualism was the common thread in the shift away from traditional religious thoughts to non-religious spirituality.

My only question is, why did it take a doctoral level research project to reveal something so obvious?